The Angel’s Game, by Carlos Ruiz Zafón (20 June — 24 June)

Wow. What a book. I have to admit that I’m still not exactly sure what happened in this book, but in this case I think that’s a good thing!

Zafón takes us to turn-of-the-century Barcelona to meet David Martín, a writer of crime stories first in the newspaper and then as part of a ridiculously long contract for monthly novels. After his first story is published, Martín receives a note from an Andreas Corelli congratulating him on his talent and expressing a wish to work with him in the future. These sorts of notes keep popping up until one day Martín and Corelli meet under odd circumstances and Martín decides to take Corelli up on his offer. This would be all well and good except it seems that Corelli has more than a few tricks up his sleeve and that Martín’s life — his health and his world — may be in a bit of danger.

This novel is a bit fantastical but still reads like something that could happen to someone you know someday. I was never really sure what was going on with Corelli or with Diego Marlasca, another mysterious character in the novel, but I was with Martín 100 percent… until near the end, when all of the novel’s truths are thrown up in the air like a deck of cards and I was turning pages furiously to see which cards would land face-up. (How about that metaphor?)

The ending was sort of a let-down; I thought it could have ended earlier, but I may be missing something. I’ll have to read this through again in the future.

Rating: 8/10
(Chunkster Challenge, Orbis Terrarum Challenge: Spain)

3 thoughts on “The Angel’s Game, by Carlos Ruiz Zafón (20 June — 24 June)

  1. Hedgie says:

    Some of your problems with The Angel's Game. may originate in that fact that it's connected to Zafon's previous novel the Shadow of the Wind; they're the first two parts of what ultimately will be a 4-part novel.

  2. Alison says:

    I've read The Shadow of the Wind and it really doesn't have a lot to do with this novel (yet? I didn't know about future novels) except for the settings, so I wouldn't say my problems were with that. I've never been a fan of long, drawn-out endings that explain what has happened to the characters; I'd usually rather imagine it myself. But if this is setting up for a third novel, color me intrigued.

  3. joel says:

    The ending was quite puzzling…which in a way isint good because it dosent give that sense of closure and excellence TSOTW had. But i did love it and anyone who loves mysteries and drama suspence and romance will love it too….not to mention unanswered questions and puzzling cliffhangers….

Leave a Reply to Hedgie Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s